Table of Contents
I 'd add Toyota 2/3TC electric motor is somewhere in the top 3 but with those domestics you absolutely have my top 4 of all time for reliability. Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 vehicle. Never ever had an engine problem. Corrosion is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply seemed like a diesel.
I question just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a difficult time getting out of it's very own method ... the 300i6 would certainly do every little thing I require this vehicle to do patgizz wrote: 3 points in the automotive world refuse to damage.
those need to be held as the benchmark to which every little thing else is gauged. Nearly everything else pales in comparison. And the Toyota 2f/3f (based upon the chevy stovebolt 6 certainly) Wow, because of the outpour of appreciation, it looked excellent so I got it, right here's the advertisement lmk what you people believe Oops, really did not mean to be cryptic, it slid my mind that the "5.0" was technically a 4.9 l.
first order of biz though, I'm rather large, and the guiding wheel to seat is relatively slim ... male that wheel cover was not ribbed for my enjoyment:-LRB- The only issue I have actually ever seen with vehicles like that, are broken shifters. Ford made them a little too tough and they would break right at the floorboard.
Bear in mind the gas mileage won't be the very best worldwide, however it will damn sure run for life. Edit: I'm 6'2" and 280. I always had lots of room in the taxi of them. wbjones created: Brian wrote: I miss my 4.9 truck. Never had an engine issue.
When the exhaust rusted off behind the pet cat it simply seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 mixed, 20 freeway with the OD5. I wonder just how hard a swap it would certainly be to get it right into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ... has a tough time getting out of it's very own way ... The engine bay had not been made for anything longer than a Mod electric motor. One canister remove an engine from a '97 design F-150 from the top, however it draws. Mod electric motors need to come out laterally and you have to draw the damper and water pump off of a 4.2. The core support does not unbolt like in F250s and later on F150s.
WonkoTheSane created: spitfirebill wrote: In respond to HappyAndy: Thank you Captain Obvious What did he claim to warrant this? I'm truly interested. I really did not see anything in his reply that would require this reaction. "They are usually trusted as gravity as long as they aren't sludged up" What engine likes sludge? Knurled created: wbjones composed: Brian composed: I miss my 4.9 truck.
Rust is a various tale. When the exhaust rusted off behind the cat it just seemed like a diesel. In 4x4 it returned 15 blended, 20 freeway with the OD5. I question how hard a swap it would be to get it into my '97 F150 that has an anemic 4.6 ...
Extremely extremely confined engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had already figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek message, that I really did not make clear ... my bad In respond to spitfirebill: I included that factor because when I needed to discover a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I needed to go through every one in every junkyard in South Jersey to locate one that wasn't sludged up truly severely.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to speak about a couple of concerns of these vans, yet I I'm plainly not mosting likely to appear and claim one is better than the other. If that's what you're looking for, you'll have to wait. Mark: So what are some of the differences in between these two brand names? Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same vehicle.
Mark: So, well, allow's begin with engines after that. Allow's talk regarding engine and actually simply to define that the version years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you know, I imply, these vans have actually been around for a lengthy time.
And, you know, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around since, you know, around that time as well. Because 2000, I suggest, Ford's, you can obtain these with V6 engines or V8s.
So, you understand, Fords, and many of them feature the Triton V8. There's a lot of concerns with these engines. In the earlier 2000 ignition system with blow to these engines, because they really did not have enough threading in the trigger plug, which triggered problems. And frequently that would certainly occur when you may be in a 15 guest bus increasing a hillside with a load of people and all of an abrupt boom, an ignition system bulges and you're stranded.
Really very cramped engine bay lengthwise. yeah, had currently figured that out ... it was a tongue in cheek post, that I really did not explain ... my negative In reply to spitfirebill: I included that factor because when I had to locate a replacement 4.9 for my F150, I had to go via each in every junkyard in South Jacket to locate one that had not been sludged up truly badly.
Bernie: Which is a better van, while we're going to speak concerning a couple of concerns of these vans, yet I I'm clearly not going to come out and claim one is better than the various other. Bernie: Well, they're essentially the very same automobile.
Mark: So, well, let's start with engines after that. Let's chat about engine and really simply to specify that the model years, we're going to start from 2000 and up, you recognize, I mean, these vans have been around for a long time.
And, you understand, for a variation of a Chevy van has actually been around given that, you recognize, around that time as well. Given that 2000, I mean, Ford's, you can get these with V6 engines or V8s.
There's a whole lot of issues with these engines. In the earlier 2000 spark plugs with impact to these engines, due to the fact that they really did not have sufficient threading in the trigger plug, which created issues.
Navigation
Latest Posts
Ford F150 dealer around Lubbock
Ford F150 dealer near me Lubbock
Ford F150 dealership